<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Ken Himmler.com &#187; Property Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenhimmler.com/category/tax-reduction-strategies/property-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenhimmler.com</link>
	<description>Wealth Design and Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8.9.2" -->
	<copyright>2006-2007 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>admin@kenhimmler.com (Ken Himmler.com)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>admin@kenhimmler.com (Ken Himmler.com)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Retirement Strategies for Conservative Investors</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Ken Himmler.com</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Ken Himmler.com</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>admin@kenhimmler.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://kenhimmler.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Minimize Estate Taxes</title>
		<link>http://kenhimmler.com/2010/12/01/minimize-estate-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://kenhimmler.com/2010/12/01/minimize-estate-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 23:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Himmler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Reduction Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing estate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenhimmler.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;What is minimizing estate taxes?</p>
<p>The act of giving away your property, either during life or at death, will probably be subject to one or more of several types of taxes (collectively referred to here as estate taxes), either on the federal level, state level, or both. These tax liabilities may be the largest potential expenses you or your estate may have to pay; federal estate tax alone may reach as high as 45 percent of your estate if you die in 2009. This also means that property you intend to go to your loved ones or others when you die may go instead to the IRS or to your state. Therefore, understanding how these taxes can be minimized is vital if you want to preserve your estate for others.</p>
<p>What are estate taxes?</p>
<p>Estate taxes are actually transfer taxes. Transfer taxes are imposed when you give your property to someone else. This can be done during life (this kind of transfer is called a gift) or at death (this kind of transfer is called a bequest or legacy if you leave a will, and intestate succession if you don&#8217;t leave a will). There are five transfer taxes that may affect your estate: (1) state gift tax, (2) state death taxes, (3) state generation-skipping transfer tax (GSTT), (4) the federal gift and estate tax, and (5) the federal GSTT.</p>
<p>State gift tax<br />
Currently, Connecticut, Louisiana, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Puerto Rico impose a gift tax. A gift is a transfer of property you (the donor) make during your lifetime. The person or organization you give to is called the donee. When you make a gift, it is in exchange for nothing or in exchange for property of lesser value (in other words, it is not a bona fide sale). Generally, gifts must be reported, and gift tax paid in the year following the year in which the gift is made (e.g., gift tax on a gift made in 2009 would be due in 2010). If your state imposes a gift tax and you intend to make lifetime gifts, you should contact your state&#8217;s department of revenue to find out what gifts need to be reported, how to compute the gift tax, and when and how to file a gift tax return.</p>
<p>State death taxes<br />
State death taxes are imposed on property distributed after your death. You should be especially aware of state death taxes because they may affect even the smallest estates. There are three types of state death taxes: inheritance tax, estate tax, and credit estate tax (commonly referred to as a sponge tax or pickup tax). Every state imposes at least one type.</p>
<p>State generation-skipping transfer tax (GSTT)<br />
Currently, some states impose a GSTT. The GSTT is imposed on property transferred to a family member who is two or more generations below you (e.g., a grandchild or great-nephew). You can contact your state&#8217;s department of revenue to find out what transfers may be subject to state GSTT, and when and how to file a return.</p>
<p>Federal gift and estate tax<br />
Generally speaking, the federal gift and estate tax is imposed on property transferred to others either while you are living or at the time of your death. Unlike the individual states which impose at least one type of death tax, and some of which impose a separate gift tax, the federal tax system is unified. In other words, the IRS adds lifetime and deathtime transfers and treats them the same. This is how the unified tax system works:<br />
Before 1976, the federal tax system worked much like that of the states. Gifts made during life (taxable gifts) were reported, and any gift tax owed was paid on an annual basis. After death, estate tax was imposed only on property owned at death (gross taxable estate). Since 1976, generally, taxable gifts are still reported, and any gift tax owed is paid annually (generally, you must file a gift tax return and pay gift tax due, if any, by April 15 of the year following the year in which you make a taxable gift). But upon death, all taxable gifts are added to your gross taxable estate for estate tax calculation purposes, even though a gift tax return may already be filed and gift tax paid (gift tax paid is deducted from the estate tax owed). The IRS unified the gift tax and estate tax systems so that: (1) you can&#8217;t avoid estate tax by giving your wealth away before you die, and (2) you pay tax on the cumulative amount of wealth you give away (this pushes your estate into a higher tax bracket).</p>
<p>The federal generation-skipping transfer tax (GSTT)<br />
Like the state-imposed GSTT, the federal GSTT is a tax imposed on property you transfer to a family member who is two or more generations below you (e.g., a grandchild or great-nephew). The IRS wants to levy a tax on property as it is passed from generation to generation at each and every level. The purpose of the GSTT is to keep families from avoiding estate tax by skipping an intermediate generation. A flat tax rate equal to the highest estate tax rate is imposed on every generation-skipping transfer you make over a certain lifetime amount ($3.5 million in 2009).<br />
Tip: The GSTT rate is the same as the maximum estate tax rate, and the GSTT exemption is the same amount as the estate tax applicable exclusion amount.<br />
You can minimize estate taxes by: (1) taking advantage of certain allowable tax exclusions, deductions, and credits, (2) using an estate freeze technique, or (3) employing post-mortem planning.</p>
<p>Exclusions, deductions, and credits<br />
Under the federal tax system, individuals are generally allowed to make gifts of up to $13,000 (2009 figure, up from $12,000 in 2008) per donee each year gift tax free under the annual gift tax exclusion.<br />
In addition, individuals are allowed to exempt a certain amount of property from the gift and estate tax.<br />
Further, transfers of property between U.S. citizen spouses are fully deductible, as are transfers of property to qualified charitable organizations.<br />
There are many exclusions, deductions, and credits that if effectively used can minimize estate taxes. You need to understand what these exclusions, deductions, and credits are, and how they work in order to take full advantage of them.<br />
Tip: States also have their own exclusions, deductions, and credits, although they may not be the same as the federal system.</p>
<p>Estate freeze<br />
An estate freeze is any planning device that allows you to freeze the present value of your estate and shift any future growth (or potential growth) to your successors.<br />
Example(s): You give land valued at $100,000 to your children. Twenty-five years later, you die. The land is valued at $500,000 on the date of your death, but only $100,000 is included in your taxable estate because the value of the land froze on the date you gave it to your children.<br />
There are many ways you can freeze the value of property. Estate freezing techniques range from relatively simple (e.g., installment sale or private annuity) to the more complex (e.g., gift- or sale-leaseback). You need to know what these techniques are and how they are used in order to know which, if any, is best for you.<br />
Tip: This generally works for state taxes also.</p>
<p>Post-mortem planning<br />
There are many post-mortem (i.e., &quot;after death&quot;) techniques that can help keep the value of your property as low as possible in order to minimize federal estate taxes. There are 10 post-mortem techniques in particular that you should know about. Even though these techniques are implemented after your death, you should understand each of them now because if you believe your estate might benefit from them, there may be things you need to do now to ensure that your estate will qualify for these elections after your death.</p>
a<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;What is minimizing estate taxes?</p>
<p>The act of giving away your property, either during life or at death, will probably be subject to one or more of several types of taxes (collectively referred to here as estate taxes), either on the federal level, state level, or both. These tax liabilities may be the largest potential expenses you or your estate may have to pay; federal estate tax alone may reach as high as 45 percent of your estate if you die in 2009. This also means that property you intend to go to your loved ones or others when you die may go instead to the IRS or to your state. Therefore, understanding how these taxes can be minimized is vital if you want to preserve your estate for others.</p>
<p>What are estate taxes?</p>
<p>Estate taxes are actually transfer taxes. Transfer taxes are imposed when you give your property to someone else. This can be done during life (this kind of transfer is called a gift) or at death (this kind of transfer is called a bequest or legacy if you leave a will, and intestate succession if you don&#8217;t leave a will). There are five transfer taxes that may affect your estate: (1) state gift tax, (2) state death taxes, (3) state generation-skipping transfer tax (GSTT), (4) the federal gift and estate tax, and (5) the federal GSTT.</p>
<p>State gift tax<br />
Currently, Connecticut, Louisiana, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Puerto Rico impose a gift tax. A gift is a transfer of property you (the donor) make during your lifetime. The person or organization you give to is called the donee. When you make a gift, it is in exchange for nothing or in exchange for property of lesser value (in other words, it is not a bona fide sale). Generally, gifts must be reported, and gift tax paid in the year following the year in which the gift is made (e.g., gift tax on a gift made in 2009 would be due in 2010). If your state imposes a gift tax and you intend to make lifetime gifts, you should contact your state&#8217;s department of revenue to find out what gifts need to be reported, how to compute the gift tax, and when and how to file a gift tax return.</p>
<p>State death taxes<br />
State death taxes are imposed on property distributed after your death. You should be especially aware of state death taxes because they may affect even the smallest estates. There are three types of state death taxes: inheritance tax, estate tax, and credit estate tax (commonly referred to as a sponge tax or pickup tax). Every state imposes at least one type.</p>
<p>State generation-skipping transfer tax (GSTT)<br />
Currently, some states impose a GSTT. The GSTT is imposed on property transferred to a family member who is two or more generations below you (e.g., a grandchild or great-nephew). You can contact your state&#8217;s department of revenue to find out what transfers may be subject to state GSTT, and when and how to file a return.</p>
<p>Federal gift and estate tax<br />
Generally speaking, the federal gift and estate tax is imposed on property transferred to others either while you are living or at the time of your death. Unlike the individual states which impose at least one type of death tax, and some of which impose a separate gift tax, the federal tax system is unified. In other words, the IRS adds lifetime and deathtime transfers and treats them the same. This is how the unified tax system works:<br />
Before 1976, the federal tax system worked much like that of the states. Gifts made during life (taxable gifts) were reported, and any gift tax owed was paid on an annual basis. After death, estate tax was imposed only on property owned at death (gross taxable estate). Since 1976, generally, taxable gifts are still reported, and any gift tax owed is paid annually (generally, you must file a gift tax return and pay gift tax due, if any, by April 15 of the year following the year in which you make a taxable gift). But upon death, all taxable gifts are added to your gross taxable estate for estate tax calculation purposes, even though a gift tax return may already be filed and gift tax paid (gift tax paid is deducted from the estate tax owed). The IRS unified the gift tax and estate tax systems so that: (1) you can&#8217;t avoid estate tax by giving your wealth away before you die, and (2) you pay tax on the cumulative amount of wealth you give away (this pushes your estate into a higher tax bracket).</p>
<p>The federal generation-skipping transfer tax (GSTT)<br />
Like the state-imposed GSTT, the federal GSTT is a tax imposed on property you transfer to a family member who is two or more generations below you (e.g., a grandchild or great-nephew). The IRS wants to levy a tax on property as it is passed from generation to generation at each and every level. The purpose of the GSTT is to keep families from avoiding estate tax by skipping an intermediate generation. A flat tax rate equal to the highest estate tax rate is imposed on every generation-skipping transfer you make over a certain lifetime amount ($3.5 million in 2009).<br />
Tip: The GSTT rate is the same as the maximum estate tax rate, and the GSTT exemption is the same amount as the estate tax applicable exclusion amount.<br />
You can minimize estate taxes by: (1) taking advantage of certain allowable tax exclusions, deductions, and credits, (2) using an estate freeze technique, or (3) employing post-mortem planning.</p>
<p>Exclusions, deductions, and credits<br />
Under the federal tax system, individuals are generally allowed to make gifts of up to $13,000 (2009 figure, up from $12,000 in 2008) per donee each year gift tax free under the annual gift tax exclusion.<br />
In addition, individuals are allowed to exempt a certain amount of property from the gift and estate tax.<br />
Further, transfers of property between U.S. citizen spouses are fully deductible, as are transfers of property to qualified charitable organizations.<br />
There are many exclusions, deductions, and credits that if effectively used can minimize estate taxes. You need to understand what these exclusions, deductions, and credits are, and how they work in order to take full advantage of them.<br />
Tip: States also have their own exclusions, deductions, and credits, although they may not be the same as the federal system.</p>
<p>Estate freeze<br />
An estate freeze is any planning device that allows you to freeze the present value of your estate and shift any future growth (or potential growth) to your successors.<br />
Example(s): You give land valued at $100,000 to your children. Twenty-five years later, you die. The land is valued at $500,000 on the date of your death, but only $100,000 is included in your taxable estate because the value of the land froze on the date you gave it to your children.<br />
There are many ways you can freeze the value of property. Estate freezing techniques range from relatively simple (e.g., installment sale or private annuity) to the more complex (e.g., gift- or sale-leaseback). You need to know what these techniques are and how they are used in order to know which, if any, is best for you.<br />
Tip: This generally works for state taxes also.</p>
<p>Post-mortem planning<br />
There are many post-mortem (i.e., &quot;after death&quot;) techniques that can help keep the value of your property as low as possible in order to minimize federal estate taxes. There are 10 post-mortem techniques in particular that you should know about. Even though these techniques are implemented after your death, you should understand each of them now because if you believe your estate might benefit from them, there may be things you need to do now to ensure that your estate will qualify for these elections after your death.</p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenhimmler.com/2010/12/01/minimize-estate-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxes in The Time Of Obama. How Might Things Change?</title>
		<link>http://kenhimmler.com/2009/05/19/taxes-in-the-time-of-obama-how-might-things-change/</link>
		<comments>http://kenhimmler.com/2009/05/19/taxes-in-the-time-of-obama-how-might-things-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Himmler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy and Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate tex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenhimmler.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10pt">
<div>&nbsp;In February, President Barack Obama rolled out his plan for the federal budget &ndash; a budget created with the vision of aiding the middle class and making health insurance available to more Americans. Since his campaign, he has also repeatedly vowed that taxes will not go up for families making less than $250,000 annually.<sup>1</sup>Given this mission and that pledge, the question becomes: how will the federal government fund the President&rsquo;s sweeping social programs? If taxes won&rsquo;t rise for the middle class and working class, where will the money come from? The all-but-certain answer: from businesses and about 3 million of the highest-earning Americans.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>Turning back the hands of time? </b>In the President&rsquo;s conception, the sun would set on tax cuts given to high-income earners during the Bush years. Families earning more than $250,000 and individuals earning more than $200,000 would contend with the tax rates they faced during the Clinton administration. The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts would expire in 2011. In 2011, the highest two tax brackets would return to 36% and 39.6%, and the capital gains tax rate would head back up to 20%. The Obama administration believes this could raise $637 billion over the coming decade.<sup>2</sup></div>
<div><b>&nbsp;</b></div>
<div><b>&nbsp;</b></div>
<div><b>Will the estate tax stay the same?</b> 2010 was to be the year of 0% estate tax &ndash; the great reprieve before estate taxes as high as 55% would hit in 2011. That was what was supposed to happen &hellip; but now it may not. President Obama wants the estate tax picture to remain as it is now, with estate tax rates of up to 45% kicking in above a $3.5 million exemption (which would be indexed to inflation for future years). In late April, a Senate proposal aimed to lower the estate tax rate and raise the exemption, but this fell by the wayside in budget negotiations with the House. So it appears the estate tax is here to stay, but it will apparently not reset to 2001 rates.<sup>3,4</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>How might things change for businesses? </b>Among the ideas being considered: a requirement that investment partnerships pay regular income tax rates rather than capital gains tax rates; revoking methods of inventory accounting that can help to cut business taxes; and further restricting corporate options for automatic deferral of federal taxes on overseas income. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has claimed that planned tax increases would only affect only about 2% of filers with business profits; the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation puts the figure at 3%.<sup>1</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>Legislators call for compromises.</b> On April 29, the House and Senate approved a $3.5-trillion outline of the proposed federal budget, but it did not include all of what the President wanted. (No Congressional Republicans voted for the budget resolution, and among them, Sen. John McCain denounced it as &ldquo;generational theft&rdquo;.)<sup>4 </sup>An important tax-linked question wasn&rsquo;t answered: how to pick up the cost of making quality healthcare accessible to more Americans. The President wants to leave more money for that mission by capping tax deductions at 28% for families earning more than $250,000 a year, as opposed to the current 33% value. Charities and homebuilders would hate that idea, and figure to lobby Congress if it advances.<sup>4</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>The Obama administration also wanted to remove subsidies to farms with annual sales of more than $500,000, and have the opportunity to bill insurance companies for treatment of injuries linked to military service. Neither idea survived budget negotiations in Congress.<sup>4 </sup>Under the budget blueprint that was approved, the $400/$800 &ldquo;Making Work Pay&rdquo; tax credit &ndash; which Obama wanted to make permanent &ndash; would disappear after 2010.<sup>4</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>Changes may call for conversation. </b>If these proposed tax changes become law, would you be affected? This is an excellent time to consider what might happen to your financial picture as a result. A talk with your financial or tax advisor may help you to identify your options.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div><b>&nbsp;</b></div>
<div><b>Citations.</b></div>
<div><sup>1 </sup>washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/26/AR2009042602838_pf.html<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [4/26/09]</span></div>
<div><sup>2</sup> money.cnn.com/2009/02/26/news/economy/obama_budget_outline/index.htm?postversion=2009022619<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [2/27/09]</span></div>
<div><sup>3 </sup>sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/25/BUGE178HU6.DTL<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [4/25/09]</span></div>
<div><sup>4 </sup>latimes.com/news/la-na-budget30-2009apr30,0,5614049.story<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; [4/30/09]</span></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
a<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10pt">
<div>&nbsp;In February, President Barack Obama rolled out his plan for the federal budget &ndash; a budget created with the vision of aiding the middle class and making health insurance available to more Americans. Since his campaign, he has also repeatedly vowed that taxes will not go up for families making less than $250,000 annually.<sup>1</sup>Given this mission and that pledge, the question becomes: how will the federal government fund the President&rsquo;s sweeping social programs? If taxes won&rsquo;t rise for the middle class and working class, where will the money come from? The all-but-certain answer: from businesses and about 3 million of the highest-earning Americans.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>Turning back the hands of time? </b>In the President&rsquo;s conception, the sun would set on tax cuts given to high-income earners during the Bush years. Families earning more than $250,000 and individuals earning more than $200,000 would contend with the tax rates they faced during the Clinton administration. The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts would expire in 2011. In 2011, the highest two tax brackets would return to 36% and 39.6%, and the capital gains tax rate would head back up to 20%. The Obama administration believes this could raise $637 billion over the coming decade.<sup>2</sup></div>
<div><b>&nbsp;</b></div>
<div><b>&nbsp;</b></div>
<div><b>Will the estate tax stay the same?</b> 2010 was to be the year of 0% estate tax &ndash; the great reprieve before estate taxes as high as 55% would hit in 2011. That was what was supposed to happen &hellip; but now it may not. President Obama wants the estate tax picture to remain as it is now, with estate tax rates of up to 45% kicking in above a $3.5 million exemption (which would be indexed to inflation for future years). In late April, a Senate proposal aimed to lower the estate tax rate and raise the exemption, but this fell by the wayside in budget negotiations with the House. So it appears the estate tax is here to stay, but it will apparently not reset to 2001 rates.<sup>3,4</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>How might things change for businesses? </b>Among the ideas being considered: a requirement that investment partnerships pay regular income tax rates rather than capital gains tax rates; revoking methods of inventory accounting that can help to cut business taxes; and further restricting corporate options for automatic deferral of federal taxes on overseas income. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has claimed that planned tax increases would only affect only about 2% of filers with business profits; the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation puts the figure at 3%.<sup>1</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>Legislators call for compromises.</b> On April 29, the House and Senate approved a $3.5-trillion outline of the proposed federal budget, but it did not include all of what the President wanted. (No Congressional Republicans voted for the budget resolution, and among them, Sen. John McCain denounced it as &ldquo;generational theft&rdquo;.)<sup>4 </sup>An important tax-linked question wasn&rsquo;t answered: how to pick up the cost of making quality healthcare accessible to more Americans. The President wants to leave more money for that mission by capping tax deductions at 28% for families earning more than $250,000 a year, as opposed to the current 33% value. Charities and homebuilders would hate that idea, and figure to lobby Congress if it advances.<sup>4</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>The Obama administration also wanted to remove subsidies to farms with annual sales of more than $500,000, and have the opportunity to bill insurance companies for treatment of injuries linked to military service. Neither idea survived budget negotiations in Congress.<sup>4 </sup>Under the budget blueprint that was approved, the $400/$800 &ldquo;Making Work Pay&rdquo; tax credit &ndash; which Obama wanted to make permanent &ndash; would disappear after 2010.<sup>4</sup></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><b>Changes may call for conversation. </b>If these proposed tax changes become law, would you be affected? This is an excellent time to consider what might happen to your financial picture as a result. A talk with your financial or tax advisor may help you to identify your options.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div><b>&nbsp;</b></div>
<div><b>Citations.</b></div>
<div><sup>1 </sup>washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/26/AR2009042602838_pf.html<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [4/26/09]</span></div>
<div><sup>2</sup> money.cnn.com/2009/02/26/news/economy/obama_budget_outline/index.htm?postversion=2009022619<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [2/27/09]</span></div>
<div><sup>3 </sup>sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/25/BUGE178HU6.DTL<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [4/25/09]</span></div>
<div><sup>4 </sup>latimes.com/news/la-na-budget30-2009apr30,0,5614049.story<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; [4/30/09]</span></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenhimmler.com/2009/05/19/taxes-in-the-time-of-obama-how-might-things-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security Increase Wont Pay The Property Tax Bill</title>
		<link>http://kenhimmler.com/2008/10/16/social-security-increase-wont-pay-the-property-tax-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://kenhimmler.com/2008/10/16/social-security-increase-wont-pay-the-property-tax-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Himmler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy and Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenhimmler.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Today we see news that Social Security will be increasing by approximately 5.8%. While this might seem like a boom to those who are retired it will be a grim result. On average those who are on retirement only have 50% &#8211; 60% of their annual expenses covered by Social Security. As an example if you have a monthly expense of $3,000 then Social Security may be paying $1,000 of this. If you get on average $63.00 increase (that by the way will be the average increase) it really only increases the total income by 2.1%. Considering that inflation <span id="more-354"></span>has gone up between 6% to 9% (depending on who you ask) it wont really make a dent. The problem is that most of the expense dynamics are out of whack. As an example: Property taxes have gone up by close to the same rate as the real estate went up from 2003 &ndash; 2006. Now real estate has dropped off by about 40% in value the taxing authorities should have dropped the tax rate by the same &ndash; right? Not even close, most taxing authorities have used their power to actually increase or keep the actual tax paid the same. Here is an example, In Sarasota, Florida there is an office building that was originally purchased for $850,000. The tax cost per year was $12,500 in 2006. Here it is 2008 and the tax cost is still $12,500 yet the value of the building is only $450,000. That is real value &ndash; meaning that it would have to drop to that to be able to sell the building. The challenge is that the tax appraisers office uses comparables. This means that they look at all the building that have sold recently to determine the fair market value. What happens in a declining market &ndash; buildings don&rsquo;t sell. IN this example the last building that could be used as a comparable was sold in 2006. This means that the tax rate is based on the highest sold building which was two years ago. Here is my suggestion for a sound way of making money and inflation proofing your retirement income. Start your own government and tax the citizens under this method. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
a<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Today we see news that Social Security will be increasing by approximately 5.8%. While this might seem like a boom to those who are retired it will be a grim result. On average those who are on retirement only have 50% &#8211; 60% of their annual expenses covered by Social Security. As an example if you have a monthly expense of $3,000 then Social Security may be paying $1,000 of this. If you get on average $63.00 increase (that by the way will be the average increase) it really only increases the total income by 2.1%. Considering that inflation <span id="more-354"></span>has gone up between 6% to 9% (depending on who you ask) it wont really make a dent. The problem is that most of the expense dynamics are out of whack. As an example: Property taxes have gone up by close to the same rate as the real estate went up from 2003 &ndash; 2006. Now real estate has dropped off by about 40% in value the taxing authorities should have dropped the tax rate by the same &ndash; right? Not even close, most taxing authorities have used their power to actually increase or keep the actual tax paid the same. Here is an example, In Sarasota, Florida there is an office building that was originally purchased for $850,000. The tax cost per year was $12,500 in 2006. Here it is 2008 and the tax cost is still $12,500 yet the value of the building is only $450,000. That is real value &ndash; meaning that it would have to drop to that to be able to sell the building. The challenge is that the tax appraisers office uses comparables. This means that they look at all the building that have sold recently to determine the fair market value. What happens in a declining market &ndash; buildings don&rsquo;t sell. IN this example the last building that could be used as a comparable was sold in 2006. This means that the tax rate is based on the highest sold building which was two years ago. Here is my suggestion for a sound way of making money and inflation proofing your retirement income. Start your own government and tax the citizens under this method. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenhimmler.com/2008/10/16/social-security-increase-wont-pay-the-property-tax-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

